AI & Big Data Expo: Exploring Ethics in AI and the Necessary Guardrails

The conversation surrounding the ethical implications of artificial intelligence has long been debated. Recently, the distinctions have become increasingly vague; technologies like AI-generated art and OpenAI’s ChatGPT demonstrate significant advancements in this field. However, these innovations prompt the question: at what cost do they come?

A recent panel at the AI & Big Data Expo in London addressed these ethical dilemmas, including the challenge of overcoming inherent biases and corporate accountability in mitigating potential job losses. James Fletcher, who oversees the responsible implementation of AI at the BBC, emphasized that the organization’s use of AI must align with its core values. He highlighted the role of AI in automating decision-making while noting that navigating ethics is a complex issue, often easier to discuss than to act upon, particularly as technologies evolve rapidly.

After a brief parental leave, Fletcher returned to a landscape altered by new technologies like Stable Diffusion, which he remarked was astonishing due to the speed of progress. He expressed concern that technological advancements could outpace efforts to address these complex challenges: “This is a socio-technical challenge, and the social aspects are particularly intricate. We need to engage not merely as technologists but as active citizens.”

As the session moderator, Daniel Gagar from PA Consulting underscored the necessity of establishing clear accountability, particularly for significant issues such as law enforcement. Priscila Chaves Martinez, director at the Transformation Management Office, pointed out the built-in inequalities that complicate ethical considerations. She highlighted the importance of ensuring that principles applied to AI development take into account the varied effects on different communities: “What works in Europe or the US may not be applicable to the global south. Whenever humans enter the equation, bias is likely to emerge. Therefore, we must prioritize social considerations before technical ones,” she asserted.

Elliot Frazier, head of AI infrastructure at the AI for Good Foundation, remarked on the urgent need for open dialogue and the establishment of frameworks within the broader AI community. He noted, “Currently, we lag significantly in standardizing practices and conducting risk assessments. A good starting point would be to engage in risk evaluation at the onset of any AI project.” His organization is developing an AI ethics audit program designed to assist organizations in framing the right questions for their AI applications and ensuring appropriate risk management strategies are in place.

For Ghanasham Apte, lead AI developer for behavior analytics and personalization at BT Group, the focus is on implementing guardrails. He warned, “We must recognize that AI is a tool—potentially dangerous if misapplied. Steps such as fostering explainable AI and addressing biases in datasets are crucial; creating multiple guardrails is essential to tackle this issue.”

However, Chaves Martinez argued that merely adding more guardrails is insufficient. “While establishing guardrails is a necessary first step, it alone won’t solve the problem. This conversation must engage the entire ecosystem, which is not uniformly represented,” she remarked.

This brings us back to Fletcher’s earlier point— the goalposts are continually shifting. “We need to ensure processes are established that hold AI accountable and contestable. This approach should involve ongoing engagement, not just a one-time checklist,” he noted. As we reflect on concepts like bias, it’s essential to acknowledge that our current understanding may evolve as new insights emerge.

Countries listed include Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, the Philippines, Pitcairn, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Qatar, Romania, the Russian Federation, Rwanda, Réunion, Saint Barthélemy, Saint Helena (including Ascension and Tristan da Cunha), Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Martin, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Other nations featured are Samoa, San Marino, São Tomé and Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Sint Maarten, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, South Sudan, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Svalbard and Jan Mayen, Sweden, Switzerland, and Syria.

In addition, there are Taiwan, Tajikistan, the United Republic of Tanzania, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tokelau, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, the Turks and Caicos Islands, Tuvalu, Türkiye, the US Minor Outlying Islands, Uganda, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Viet Nam, the British Virgin Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Wallis and Futuna, Western Sahara, Yemen, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. The Åland Islands are also noted.

Please note that permissions are required. By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice.